Polemic
Here at 'Box of Meat', we are taking a stand against the Hornbeyisation of the Infosphere. We refer the reader to the practice of listmaking. Once a practice in carried out by highly skilled artisans in pollution of the male adolescent's bedroom, it is now a virulent form of showing off. So far has it reached that, such young voices as HK, TL and CK (he did have something up, but he seems to have thought better of it) have all succumbed. Perhaps it is the search for page views (or 'eyeballs') that is impelling them to the egregious activity. In the case of the authors above, 'Box of Meat' objects to the apparent special pleading that their roll-call of grooviness implies. 'In your calculations of our worth, factor in the company we keep'.
When you pursue one of the bum-steers found on these lists, you are oftened hookeyed into a purchase that you never consume. Worse still if you do consume your purchase, often it is 'of note', it smells of the Present, but it tastes of a Recommendation. The authority has had their oily mits on it already. It is the same sensation that you get when you go on the pointer of a movie poster. 'Possibly the Best British Horror Film of the Decade' Empire. Those invisible opinion-formers, the men in grey mullets, have got in there first.
Another thing. In an earlier post, 'Box of Meat' proposed a txt campaign to win A from the arms of Weedy Boyfriend. The low-level pestering never happened. This potential mischief was averted by daily imbibement of healthful Bromine. 'Box of Meat' rushes to condemn any dirty other box thinking to copycat the plan.
Keep it tupperware. Keep it sealed tight.
I am not at the 'flaccid for the next week and a half (on my holiday) so posts may reduce from a gush to a trickle. Rest assured, when back in the ennui of the office, the tap will be turned back on.
I leave you 98.7.
PS Have you noticed the inappropriacy of the .com tag? All of the writers cited above are namesurname.com. .com is as good as .org or .edu but the unilateral declaration of yourself as a business concern seems wrong. Can I make a modest proposal? Can the W3 Consortium institute a .van for those who want to punt themselves online? Much obliged.
[ peteW 18/05/2004 17:45:07]
.van was meant to be for vanity publishing. cinestatic could use it for example.
[ Matthew 18/05/2004 19:21:53]
Care to comment? 
