[x][re:]

[re:] is the [x] presented by the notion of a [re:] but the [x] to [re:] a moment no longer [re:] as such by [x] the [x] to [re:] a possibility, since rendered inexistent, and to [re:] and [re:] in a new form that [x] [re:]

[x] in the late-capitalist post societies [x] are taught that the great movements of the [re:] are over - as if they were thought of [re:] at the [x] [re:] are taught that [x] is dead and that in any case it meant the same as [x] as if [x] did not begin life as a [re:] the [x] is the best our [re:] social models are the [x] ones and the [x] to [re:] is the only one worth [x] for. Meanwhile [re:] are spoonfed in the name of [x] the recycled necromantic wreckage of [x] [re:] and [re:] [x] when they were taken thirty years ago or more and now are drained of all [x] and desire.

[re:] suggest this and [x] take this truth to be [x] when the [re:] ends the [x] dies and that the only moment that can ever be [re:] is this single [x] right here by [x] and through it but to do it means to [re:] in the process a new [x] and a new [re:] needs to be [x] out of the latent currents in the [re:] [x]

"[re:]” wrote [x] “[re:]” And we have [re:] this [x] in the [x] and in a way we still [re:] it now. But what are these [x] [re:] already, of which [x] writes on here? And how can these [x] be known? When they are as different for us and everyone else in the [re:] as they are for us and us ourselves?

For [re:] as for [re:] the final [x] to both these questions was ultimately very simple. Simply: [x] must only learn to [re:] with their [x] [x] with their [re:] the whirlpools and tornadoes in the never-static [x] and this is why [re:] took its name from the latin verb [x] – because they understood that time they had, and to a degree they were, was always already gone and disappearing. Like [re:]

And [x] want to [re:] [x] and by that we don’t mean that we want simply to [re:] them, the [x] of them, or [re:] them, [re:] their mistakes. Rather, we want to [re:] their [x] only so that we can start from [x] so that we can leave that place [x]

And in all of this, the general [x] remains the same: we [x] without condition the [x] of [x] without [re:]