12 July 2009
parallax issue on rancière
Downloads are here (thanks to Nathan in Ben's comments box). The files are listed by article name, but you can match names to the articles by using the handy table of contents listed below. Rancière's response, in which he writes about himself in the third person, is included. It also includes something by me, written so long ago I can scarcely remember it. I conclude that:
Perhaps then we should reserve Badiou's notion of equality for those moments when organised anti-systemic political subjects rise up and work with Rancière's conception in the everyday battles and sites of real struggle that threaten to prevent us from thinking that there can be something different than this at all.
Which sounds quite rousing, doesn't it! Perhaps I should read myself in the third person...
Parallax, Volume 15 Issue 3 2009
Jacques Rancière: in Disagreement
Paul Bowman; Richard Stamp
Conjunctive Times, Disjointed Time: Philosophy between Enigma and Disagreement
Sudeep Dasgupta
Politics without Politics
Jodi Dean
Politics after Aesthetics: Disagreeing with Rancière
David Ferris
Heteroreductives – Rancière’s disagreement with ontology
Bram Ieven
Which Equality? Badiou and Rancière in Light of Ludwig Feuerbach
Nina Power
JR cinéphile, or the philosopher who loved things
Adrian Rifkin
‘A literary animal’: Rancière, Derrida, and the Literature of Democracy
Mark Robson
When Does Politics Happen?
Paulina Tambakaki
A few remarks on the method of Jacques Rancière
Jacques Rancière
