
One of
the saddest sights of last year was the file of middle-class fashionistas
queuing up outside Covent Garden's Birkenstock shoe shop so they could
get their hands on the brand's new range of expensive posh pumps.
They had lately been endorsed by, I dunno, Sadie Frost, Sarah-Jessica
Parker and Jude Law and then in turn by Times Style, Cosmo, Glamour
and GQ and had become hot property. Get those goods owned, they urged
themselves.
People
had to get their plates in them as surely as they had to buy that
expensive ticket to a football match, that 'budget' airline ticket
(even though it's over £100) to Rome and that last drink which
is comfortably over £3. The hefty tax if anything acting as
an inspiration. Why? As mature capitalism maintains its vice-like
grip on the masses' minds, we are foundering in a cornucopic morass
of constant acquisition, where consumption is always insufficient
and there's always something else "you've taken a fancy to".
Somewhere along the line the more honest, indulgent, havin' it culture
shifted to mean simply have it all, do it all, buy, take, consume
like fuckery - as kind of predicted in Renton's final soliloquy
in Trainspotting. The questions for these sad fuckers, when will
you stop? Can you really get no satisfaction? Is it just me or is
'retail therapy' a grotesque term for such a mindless activity?
And
why such rampant materialism? Salient points are legion. For a start
we have a Bush administration and a Blair government/Brown chancellorship
desperate to keep us spending (preferably on plastic) as well as
buying property at ridiculous values because they know that this
is keeping the economy afloat - and these short-term methadonic
fixes are far easier to implement than prevention and cure of a
smacked-out 'globalisation' system, which is actually nothing of
the sort. Then there's the fact that the world's biggest manufacturers
of stuff such as Disney, GM, Nike are all powerful lobbyists exercising
far more leverage with politicians than we could ever muster. They
will get their tax breaks, their offshore registrations and their
Asian sweatshops and that will make it financially far easier to
promote their product. Make this stuff in the West (and help to
cure the economy)? No way, I have chief financial officers and audit
houses obsessively analysing every financial quarter and I simply
can't allow the extra costs to impact on my 'bottom line'. So it
all gets moved overseas. Slavery by another name, really.
Selective
cornucopia
These are top-down issues but more blame lies in the unfettered,
all-encompassing, post-war deregulated development of the capitalist,
consumer society, with its evil twin bruv marketing. Ideology has
become irrelevant as we are made to recognise the supremacy of the
product and its must-have status in our lives. Whichever sector
you look at - white goods, technical equipment, leisurewear, supermarkets
- you see ruthless in-house marketing teams coalescing with equally
shithead PR agencies. Terms have now sprung up like 'ambient' or
'viral' marketing which are just terms for shoving this stuff in
our faces any which way and via any medium possible. Deny the punter
any downtime whatsoever and he'll surely get the mantra of procurement.
This even extends to the enthusiastic students out on the streets
doing market research for well-meaning charitable orgs: your opinion
might very well be 'valued' but your time is being invaded for a
direct debit donation to service your extreme guilt. Of course you
still feel bad in speeding straight past, but those 'chuggers' want
a piece of your arse as much as the next bourgeois cog (this is
not to say that if you look in the back of Big Issue or New International
that there aren't some good outlets for conscious/green/fair trade,
etc investment. But like the Prius electric car or the sop of 'Corporate
Social Responsibility' these are developing slowly and need much
more coverage. Let's see all non-fair-trade products labelled with
a big Unfair Trade logo to remind you that someone else is paying
for your cheap products).
Such
omniinvasion doesn't always work. Sony has been running billboard/magazine
'campaigns' recently promoting the creative values of their PCs,
Mp3 players, digi-cams, etc, wherein individuals repose smugly after
having just, say, downloaded some tracks onto MD. As with mobile
operator O2's trance mantra 'see what you can do', there is supposedly
some next-level techno empowerment in getting the basic functionality
out of your kit, but the overall effect is: fuck off smug prick
and fuck off Sony.
The
upgrade culture is another aspect whereby marketeers make damn sure
we will be returning to shops periodically to get the latest versions,
like a dealer saying he's just got the better shit in. The minute
variations in Nike trainers that somehow make us 'individual' are
a facet of this. Indeed, those Berks-in-stocks would have had as
their inspiration the chance to be 'the first' and 'unique' with
the new designs, ignoring the fact that others in the queue were
buying exactly the same thing. (And the slightly more retro DIY
fashion of the mo lacks the free spirit of the original: indeed
retro is a post-modern way of giving you more choice, more stuff
to buy; no longer is it just an alternative option propagated by
small units in rundown parts of town).
Of
course retro and NOSTALGIA are vital ties into the cap culture.
Another lovely sight is estate agent Foxton's fleet of souped-up
Minis, itself acting on kitsch notions of the Brit swinging '60s
for infantilist effect, daubed in graffiti, supposedly pleasing
the 30-somethings who remember their tentative dabbles with the
new street 20 years ago. "This double-edged reverie is making
me feel so good about myself: I'm going to have me a look in the
estate agents". And so onto a massive loan (I believe they're
called mortgages) for a box in Islington. This is to say nothing
of an actual branch of Foxton's I went past the other day - all
decked out to look like a fucking flash bar with its chrome fittings,
drinks-laden fridges and modern chairs. Again, it's all about creating
synergies in easy minds, all to facilitate the 'experience' so that
they damn well buy that property.
Which
leads me onto the development of personal financial services. More
and more of us are spunking ('investing') more and more and more
of our dough on an array of ISAs, Tessas (lovely girls), endowments,
gilt-linked bonds, stocks and shares, etc. Much of which doesn't
seem to deliver the promised returns anyway. All the serious papers
and their Sunday counterparts now come with weighty 'Cash' or 'Money'
sections that help you invest your money, give you advice, provide
a forum for complaints (see Consumer Democracy, below) and crucially,
because they are not stand-alone isolated, philanthropic publications,
carry pages and pages of ads for the Standard Lifes and Eggs of
this world. Likewise on TV. Jonathan Franzen's Corrections
paints in its earlier pages a Clinton-era picture of anyone savvy
and with a few quid becoming DIY brokers, moving their money around
like they really know what they're talking about with the same facility
as sending an email. Since dotcom bust and 9/11 slump there has
been far less proliferation of this trend.
The
top-down reasons for the exponential rise in financial services
are roughly the same as above - the financial and real estate sectors
must convince us of the virtue and vitality of their stuff - but
obviously apart from property there is less fetishisation of these
nebulous 'products' (there is nothing physical about them). Yet
these myriad financial instruments are there to provide a level
of infantilist comfort and an escape from harsh realities and the
possibility that it could go tits-up at any moment. We may be cutting
the world's nose off with our policies but I am not going to spite
my face at the same time. Selfish politics, selfish person. Accumulation
of wealth as well as accumulation of stuff... that's the way to
go out.
So,
am I saying: fuck it all off and spend, spend, spend on destructive
products like fags and booze and drugs and cheap fried breakfasts?
Well no not really. In the end the other products are just like
these drugs nowadays; they have the same appetitive/addictive function
- even spiritual crutches for some - but are ultimately meaningless.
And so much is made about the rebellious nature of booze and drugs
(only because they are harmful it seems) but the reality is that
they are manufactured by either big business or illegal cartels
with precisely the same lack of scruples about their cause and effect.
No,
I am saying that if we lived in a more globally equitable world
we sick western fucks wouldn't have so much money and the relentless
parade and purchasing of all these products would be relegated somewhat
down the priority list. Chances of that happening without much more
material of this ilk are minimal.
Brand hegemony breeds loyalty. Brand-loyal is a mantra for any FMCG
(fast moving consumer good, dearie) marketer of any pile of shite
and how they go about convincing us of the necessity of their stuff
over somebody else's is achieved in myriad ways slightly alluded
to above. Don't like Adidas, choose Nike. Vodafone's shite, I like
Orange. Nokia is everywhere, I'm going for an Ericsson, etc, etc.
That's what this culture of choice leads to - expenditure going
to select 'trusted' firms - like you really have an intimate relationship
with them. Listen, the one with 50% market share is going to buy
out the one with 30% so they'll be the same. There was never that
much difference between them anyway.
Everything
is so fucking integrated innit? The music that accompanied the ad
for the phone you bought is available on a TV ad compilation CD
(there's a site informing you too); the film tie-ins will take you
down the Showcase, and I like the logo on the front of my favourite
team.
Moreover,
the majority do not seem to have cottoned onto the fact that most
magazines/publications are simply there to make you buy stuff. Without
the thriving advertising industry they represent, these 'consumer-facing'
publications wouldn't exist - so get out there and buy goddamit.
There's no escape. Except of course there is, with a little thought
and a conscious displacing of yourself from this market in perpetual
motion. Me, I am happy with my 1G phone, I buy one pair of trainers
a year and I am always looking in the discount section of the supermarket.
Ooh, you pikey! Oh yeah, this in/exclusive nature of the brand-led
market is great too.
Material
escapism
Of course the supremacy of such rampant consumption isn't working
in a vacuum. For the many with their multi-channel digital TV package
and DVD players they are feeding themselves heady opiates that will
anaesthetise or divert them from the fucked-up world and keep them
firmly on the consumer merry-go round. It is all tuned into the
evasive 'easier option'. And this is the chief reason why I'm driven
to write this because such concentration abrogates any change in
political, social or cultural consciousness. That camera phone is
a product not a lifestyle. It cannot improve you as a person. You're
the same ignorant cakehole you always were.
So
the only rights that now seem to matter (in terms of what Joe Public
gets worked up about) are to do with this materialism. We may have
had more people up in arms about the hikes in petrol prices than
the unjust Iraq war. We live in Lynne Foulds Wood's Consumer Democracy,
a material world where the creed is absolutely greed is good.
Don't
read a book or teach yourself an 'ology, get in the car and drive
to the retail park. Treat yourself, Cheat yourself. Switch off not
on. Buy a broadsheet, but only for the 'lifestyle' stuff. Dare not
feed your head, stuff it all full of comforting irrelevancies instead.
|